As your Laravel projects change and grow, it’s likely that you’ll add new config fields and onboard new team members to work alongside you. Especially for junior developers, setting up config and environment variables on your local development machine for the first time for each project can sometimes (but not always) be quite confusing.
You can sometimes find yourself scratching your head thinking “have I put the right API key here?“, or “is this the right URL for this environment variable?“, and “what are the different values that this config field can be?“.
Of course, these types of issues can be avoided with well written and up-to-date documentation. But, wouldn’t it be better if these questions could be answered, and enforced, programmatically before running your app rather than by eye or waiting until your code fails during runtime?
Table of Contents
What is Laravel Config Validator?
Laravel Config Validator is a package that I built with the aim of trying to solve these issues by providing the ability for developers to define rules that can be used to validate config fields. It allows you to validate your config fields using an Artisan command so that you and other developers can be sure that they have the correct config set up.
The main benefit of using this package is that it encourages code-as-documentation, because you can update your config validation rules each time your config changes rather than updating a boring markdown file with your project’s documentation that’s likely hidden away and never looked at.
It also allows you to write complex rules relatively easily. For example, let’s say that you had a config field that stored your Mailgun API keys. You could write a simple rule to make sure that the key is present and is a string. But, you could take it one step further and write a rule that makes a HTTP request to the API to confirm that the keys are actually valid and can be used to make the requests in your application.
To get a better idea of how this might look in your codebase, here’s a basic example of how we could validate that a services.mailchimp.api_key
field could be validated:
After defining a rule like above, we could then run the package’s provided command (php artisan config:validate
). If the services.mailchimp.api_key
field is valid, the validation will pass. Otherwise, the command will return a list of the errors so that we can spot the incorrect config value, similar to in this example screenshot below:
The best part about the package (in my opinion) is that you don’t need to learn any new syntax! Under the hood, the package uses the Validator
provided by Laravel. So, you can use the same rules that you would typically use in your request validation.
Now, let’s take a look at how you can install the package and start using it in your own projects.
Installing the Package
To get started with using the package, you’ll need to make sure that your Laravel project is using at least Laravel 8.0 and PHP 8.0.
You can install the package via Composer using the following command:
The package ships with some handy rulesets that you can use to validate some of the default Laravel config fields. These are completely optional, but they can provide a good starting point for validating your app’s config. If you want to use the default rulesets, you can publish them using the following command:
The above command will copy the validation files and place them in a config-validation
folder in your project’s root. These rules are just to get you started, so there will likely be some rules that aren’t needed for your project. So, once you’ve published them, feel free to delete them or edit them as much as you’d like.
Defining Config Validation Rulesets
Now that we have the package installed, we can start creating our own rulesets.
Creating new rulesets is really simple using the package’s provided command. For example, if we wanted to create a ruleset for validating the config in the config/app.php
file, we could run the following command:
Running the above command would create a file in config-validation/app.php
ready for you to start adding your config validation.
It’s important to remember that your config validation files’ names need to match the config file that you want to validate. For example, if you want to validate your config/mail.php
file, your validation file would need to be stored as config-validation/mail.php
.
Adding Rules to a Ruleset
Once you have your ruleset file created in the config-validation
directory, we can start adding our validation rules.
Under the hood, the package uses the built-in Validator
class that ships with Laravel and makes use of all the existing validation rules available in Laravel, so working with it should seem pretty familiar.
Let’s take a basic example and create a new validation rule for the driver
field in the app/mail.php
file. We’ll define a rule that says the field must be one of the following: smtp
, sendmail
, mailgun
, ses
, or postmark
. To do this, we could write the following rule:
As you can see, it’s really simply to define a rule!
Custom Validation Error Messages
There may be times when you want to override the default error message for a specific validation rule. This is simple to do using the messages
method on the Rule
object when defining your rulesets.
For example, if we wanted to override the error message for our mail.driver
config validation rule that we’ve created, we could do it like so:
Only Running in Specific App Environments
It’s possible that you might want to create rules that should only ever be run in specific environments. For example, you might want to create a relaxed set of validation rules for your local development environment and have a stricter set of rules for production.
To specify the environment that a rule can be run in, you can use the environments
method available on the Rule
object. If no environment is defined, the rule will be run in all environments by default.
For example, let’s imagine that when we’re working on our project locally, we don’t really care which mail driver we’re using. But, when in production, we want to make sure that we are only using mailgun
. So, we could create a relaxed rule to run locally and a stricter rule to run in production like so:
Running the Config Validation
Now that we’ve learned how to define our own config validation rulesets, let’s take a look at how to actually run the validation.
Using the Command
The most common (and easiest) way that you can run your config validation is using the Artisan command that ships with the package.
You can use it by running the following command:
However, you might not always want to validate all the config values in your application. So, the command allows you to specify the exact config files that you want to validate. To do this, you can use the --files
option.
For example, if we only wanted to validate the config/auth.php
file, we could run the following command:
Likewise, if wanted to explicitly define more than one file to validate at once, we could pass multiple names to the --files
option separated by commas. For example, to validate the config/auth.php
and config/services.php
files, we could run the following command:
Running the Validation Manually
There may be times when you’d prefer to run the validation command manually in your code, rather than using the provided command. To do this, you can simply call the run
method on the AshAllenDesignConfigValidatorServicesConfigValidator
class like so:
By default, the run
method will return true
if all the validation checks pass. If any of the checks fail, an AshAllenDesignConfigValidatorExceptionsInvalidConfigValueException
will be thrown.
Similar to how we can define the specific validation rulesets that should be run using the command, we can also do the same with the ConfigValidator
object. To do this, we can pass an array of config file names to the run
method.
For example, if we wanted to only run the validation for the config/auth.php
file, we could use the following code:
Running in a Service Provider
A good example of where you might want to manually run your config validation could be in a service provider. This is an ideal place to run the config validation rules in your local environment when developing to make sure that you have all the valid values. This is particularly useful if you are jumping between Git branches often that include different fields with different required config fields.
Here’s how we could automatically run the config validation on each request in our local
environment, and ignore it when running in production
or testing
:
Throwing and Preventing Exceptions
As we mentioned above, by default, the ConfigValidator
class will throw an AshAllenDesignConfigValidatorExceptionsInvalidConfigValueException
exception if the validation fails. The exception will contain the error message of the first config value that failed the validation.
However, there may be times when you don’t want to throw an exception on the first failure and would rather run all the rules at once. To do this, you can prevent the exception from being thrown and instead rely on the boolean return value of the run
method by using the throwExceptionOnFailure
method. If we disable exceptions from being thrown, the run
method will return false
if any of the validation checks fail.
By preventing any exceptions from being thrown, we can then get the failed validation errors using the errors
method, which will return them as an array.
The example belows shows how you could prevent any exceptions from being thrown so that you can grab the errors:
This is actually how the package’s command runs the validator so that it can display all the failures in the output at once.
Hopefully, this post should have given you an overview of how you can use the Laravel Config Validator package in your Laravel apps to validate your app’s config values. If you’re interested in checking out the code for the package, you can view it in the GitHub repo.
If you enjoyed reading this post, I’d love to hear about it. Likewise, if you have any feedback to improve the future ones, I’d also love to hear that too.
Keep on building awesome stuff!
This content was originally published here.