V-Techtips March: Top 10 AI Models in 2025: Which One Is The Best Choice For Coding

The 2025 AI coding landscape is revolutionized by Grok, DeepSeek, ChatGPT, and Gemini, with even more AI joining the race! 

A simple Internet search will highlight that Grok excels in complex automation and integrates seamlessly into development environments. DeepSeek leverages advanced machine learning for efficient code generation. ChatGPT and Gemini offer enhanced coding assistance with intuitive user experiences. 

But how much of that is the truth? How does AI coding assist programmers in there day-to-day work, to improve their productivity?

Get to the meaty part of AI coding, with our V-Techtips this month. By determining the best tool depends on specific needs; this blog will compare features, strengths, and use cases to guide your decision. Explore the cutting-edge world of automated coding and find the optimal solution for your projects.

Top AI Coding Assistants of 2025

The AI landscape is dynamic, with new models emerging and existing ones evolving rapidly. Based on industry rankings and recent reports, here are the top contenders in 2025:

According to industry’s benchmarks, as well as their utilities for programmers, here is a table summarizing the top AI models of 2025, focusing on each model’s unique strengths in coding and development tasks:

Chatbot	Key Features	Coding Capabilities
ChatGPT	Contextual understanding, code completion, debugging assistance	Helps developers write code faster, debug, and explore code libraries efficiently
DeepSeek	Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) approach, efficient code generation, strong in technical tasks	Excels in technical writing scenarios and competitive programming challenges
Gemini	Multimodal input handling, code generation, debugging, integration with Google Workspace	Ideal for multimodal code generation, integrating text and images for enhanced coding assistance
Claude	Code accuracy, complex task handling, debugging with explanations	Well-suited for automating code review and linting tasks, ensuring code quality and consistency
Qwen	Strong in regional tech ecosystems, supports machine learning and data science workflows, long context handling	Strong in regional tech ecosystems and supports machine learning and data science workflows
Grok	Real-time data integration, “Think Mode” and “Big Brain Mode” for complex tasks	Ideal for real-time data analysis and complex problem-solving in coding tasks
Mistral	Open-source flexibility, fast response times, optimized for enterprise applications	Optimized for enterprise-level applications and multilingual code generation
Llama	Efficient and versatile, supports infilling, handles long context	Efficient and versatile for various coding tasks, including code completion and infilling
GitHub Copilot	Real-time code suggestions, autocompletion, supports multiple programming languages	Helps developers write code faster, debug, and handle repetitive tasks efficiently
Microsoft Azure AI	Low-code platform (Power Virtual Agents), multichannel deployment, centralized management	Enables developers to create and deploy bots with minimal coding experience

These models represent the cutting edge of AI technology, each with its own strengths and areas of specialization.

Comparing AI Coding Assistants’ Abilities

Model	Code Generation Accuracy	Debugging Capabilities	Language Support	Key Features
ChatGPT	High	Moderate	Python, JavaScript, C++, and more	Contextual understanding, code completion, debugging assistance
DeepSeek	High	High	Python, C++, JavaScript, and more	Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) approach, efficient code generation, strong in technical tasks
Gemini	Moderate	Moderate	Python, JavaScript, C++, and more	Multimodal input handling, code generation, debugging, integration with Google Workspace
Claude	High	High	Python, JavaScript, C++, and more	Code accuracy, complex task handling, debugging with explanations
Qwen	High	Moderate	Python, Chinese, and more	Strong in regional tech ecosystems, supports machine learning and data science workflows
Grok	High	High	Python, JavaScript, C++, and more	Real-time data integration, “Think Mode” and “Big Brain Mode” for complex tasks
Mistral	High	Moderate	Python, JavaScript, C++, and more	Open-source flexibility, fast response times, optimized for enterprise applications
Llama	Moderate	Moderate	Python, C++, Java, and more	Efficient and versatile, supports infilling, handles long context
Azure AI	Moderate	Moderate	Python, JavaScript, C#, and more	Low-code platform (Power Virtual Agents), multichannel deployment for coding automation
GitHub Copilot	High	High	Python, JavaScript, TypeScript, Ruby, and more	Real-time suggestions within IDEs (e.g., VS Code), test generation commands (/tests), error fixing (/fix), inline chat for explanations

Top 10 AI For Code Generation: Strength, Weaknesses and Prices

1. ChatGPT: 

ChatGPT exhibits strong code generation capabilities across various programming languages. It can generate code from natural language descriptions, provide code completions, and assist in debugging. Its strength lies in understanding context and generating human-like code with detailed explanations. While it can assist with code refactoring and minor modifications, this might not be its strongest suit.

Price:

• Free: Offers basic access with usage limits.  
• Plus: $20/month for extended access and features.  
• Pro: $200/month for unlimited access to advanced models and features.  
• Team: $30 per user/month (billed monthly) or $25 per user/month (billed annually).
• Enterprise: Custom pricing (sources quote $60 per user/month)

Strengths	Weaknesses
High accuracy in code generation across various languages	Struggles with complex or nuanced coding scenarios requiring deep domain knowledge
Strong contextual understanding, generating human-like code with explanations	Limited code refactoring capabilities
Versatile, supporting a wide range of programming languages and coding tasks	Potential for generating outdated code or suggesting deprecated API endpoints

2. DeepSeek: 

DeepSeek excels in code generation, particularly in Python, C++, and JavaScript. It utilizes a Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) approach, activating only the most relevant parameters for each task, leading to efficient code generation. DeepSeek has shown impressive performance in technical tasks and competitive programming challenges. However, it may require more technical expertise for customization and fine-tuning.

Price:

• Free: Offers free access for up to 50 daily messages.
• Pro: $1 per million tokens.  
• API: Costs associated with API usage.

Strengths	Weaknesses
High accuracy and efficiency in code generation, particularly in Python, C++, and JavaScript	Limited contextual understanding and struggles with integrating real-time knowledge
Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) approach for efficient code generation	Potential biases in politically sensitive topics
Strong in technical tasks and competitive programming challenges	Requires more technical expertise for customization and fine-tuning

3. Gemini: 

Gemini offers advanced coding assistance with features like debugging, code generation, and explaining code logic. It supports multiple programming languages and integrates seamlessly with Google Workspace. Additionally, Gemini can analyze images and generate code, showcasing its multimodal capabilities. However, some users find its code explanations less detailed compared to ChatGPT.

Price:

• Free: Basic access with limited features.  
• Advanced: $19.99/month.  
• Business: $20/month/user (annual commitment) or $24/month/user (flexible plan).  
• Enterprise: $30/month/user (annual commitment) or $36/month/user (flexible plan).  
• Code Assist Standard: $19/month/user (annual commitment) or $22.80/month/user (flexible plan).  
• Code Assist Enterprise: $45/month/user (annual commitment) or $54/month/user (flexible plan).  
• Vertex AI: Usage-based pricing for different models and tasks

Strengths	Weaknesses
Multimodal capabilities, handling text, images, and code	Less detailed code explanations compared to ChatGPT
Advanced coding assistance with debugging, code generation, and explaining code logic	Potential for hallucinations (generating incorrect or irrelevant outputs)
Integration with Google Workspace, enhancing productivity	Limited in handling edge cases or unusual situations

4. Claude: 

Claude stands out for its coding accuracy and ability to handle complex technical tasks. It excels in debugging, offering detailed explanations for each fix. Claude also performs well in code generation, producing clean and optimized code. It can edit files and execute tests, further enhancing its coding capabilities. However, it may have stricter usage limits compared to ChatGPT Plus.

Price:

• Free: Basic access with usage limits.  
• Pro: $20/month (billed monthly) or $18/month (billed annually).  
• Team: $30/month/user (billed monthly) or $25/month/user (billed annually).  
• Enterprise: Custom pricing (reportedly $60 per user/month).  
• API: Usage-based pricing for different models.

Strengths	Weaknesses
High accuracy and ability to handle complex technical tasks	Occasional crashes and verbosity in responses
Strong debugging capabilities with detailed explanations for fixes	Strict usage limits compared to other models
Efficient code generation, producing clean and optimized code	Limited real-world knowledge and struggles with nuanced language

5. Qwen: 

Qwen demonstrates strong performance in Python and Chinese programming languages. It excels in code generation for regional tech ecosystems and supports machine learning and data science workflows. Qwen has shown competitive performance in code generation benchmarks, including HumanEval, MBPP, and DS-1000. It can process up to 128,000 tokens, enabling more detailed analysis and complex responses, and offers specialized models like Qwen2.5-Math for enhanced mathematical reasoning. However, it may require a steeper learning curve for developers unfamiliar with Alibaba’s ecosystem.

Price:

• Open-source models: Free access and customization.  
• API: Costs associated with API usage.

Strengths	Weaknesses
Strong in regional tech ecosystems and supports machine learning and data science workflows	High computing power requirements for optimal performance
Long context handling, processing up to 128,000 tokens	Limited versatility for general-purpose coding tasks
Strong performance in Python and Chinese programming languages	Potential for language mixing or unexpected switching between languages

6. Grok:

Grok excels in reasoning and coding tasks, particularly in technical and mathematical problem-solving. It features “Think Mode” and “Big Brain Mode” for handling complex analytical tasks. Grok also integrates real-time data from the web and X (formerly Twitter) for up-to-date code generation. It utilizes a mixture-of-experts approach and DeepSearch for step-by-step reasoning. However, it may fall short in real-time data integration compared to Google Gemini.

Price:

• Free: Limited free access for all X users.
• X Premium: $8/month (billed monthly) or $7/month (billed annually).
• X Premium+: $40/month (billed monthly) or $32.92/month (billed annually).
• SuperGrok: $30/month (billed monthly) or $300/year.
• API: Usage-based pricing expected.

Strengths	Weaknesses
Real-time data integration from the web and X (formerly Twitter)	Limitations in reasoning depth and fact-checking
Advanced reasoning capabilities, particularly in technical and mathematical problem-solving	Inconsistent image processing quality
“Think Mode” and “Big Brain Mode” for handling complex analytical tasks	Potential for slower response times due to real-time data fetching

7. Mistral: 

Mistral offers open-source flexibility for developers and prioritizes accuracy and response speed in code generation. Its models are optimized for enterprise-level applications and multilingual capabilities. However, it may have less refined conversational capabilities compared to ChatGPT.

Price:

• Open-source models: Free access and customization.  
• API: Usage-based pricing per million tokens, varies by model.

Strengths	Weaknesses
Open-source flexibility, allowing for free access and customization	Less refined conversational capabilities compared to ChatGPT
Fast response times, prioritizing accuracy and speed in code generation	Potential for prompt injections, where malicious prompts can manipulate the model’s behavior
Optimized for enterprise-level applications and multilingual capabilities	Limited context window, struggling with long-range code completion tasks

8. Llama: 

Llama is designed to be efficient and versatile, capable of handling a wider range of tasks, including code generation. It supports many popular programming languages and has shown improvements in code generation compared to previous iterations. Llama supports 16k token sequences and offers infilling capabilities, allowing it to insert code into existing code. However, it may require more computational power for complex queries compared to ChatGPT.

Price:

• Open-source models: Free access and customization.
• Commercial use: Requires licensing through Meta. Costs vary by model and usage.

Strengths	Weaknesses
Efficient and versatile, capable of handling a wider range of tasks, including code generation	Limited in handling complex mathematical or reasoning tasks
Supports infilling, allowing it to insert code into existing code	Requires more computational power for complex queries compared to other models
Handles long context with its 16k token sequence support	Potential for generating code with logical errors or vulnerabilities

9. GitHub Copilot

GitHub Copilot is an AI-powered coding assistant developed by GitHub and OpenAI. It integrates seamlessly into popular IDEs like Visual Studio Code, JetBrains, and Neovim, offering real-time code suggestions, autocompletion, and debugging support. Built on OpenAI’s Codex and later enhanced with GPT-4, Copilot is trained on vast datasets of source code and natural language. It excels in streamlining coding workflows by predicting code snippets, generating entire functions, and helping developers navigate unfamiliar frameworks.

Price:

• For individuals: $10/month or $100/year.
• For businesses: $19 per user/month.

Strengths	Weaknesses
Real-time code suggestions in the IDE	May generate incorrect or incomplete code, requiring careful review
Autocompletion that supports multiple programming languages	Limited in understanding complex or nuanced coding scenarios
Helps developers write code faster and debug efficiently	May not be ideal for extensive code refactoring

10. Azure AI

Azure AI is a suite of cloud-based AI services provided by Microsoft as part of the Azure platform. It includes tools like Azure Machine Learning, Cognitive Services, and Applied AI Services to simplify the creation, deployment, and management of AI applications. Azure AI supports low/no-code development for building custom AI agents and offers advanced features such as automated machine learning, distributed training, and hyperparameter tuning. It is widely used for tasks like real-time translations, security applications, and team communication while prioritizing ethical AI practices.

Price:

• Pricing varies significantly depending on the specific service used.
• Azure OpenAI Service: Usage-based pricing for different models and tasks.
• Azure Cognitive Services: Pricing varies by service and usage.  
• Azure Bot Service: Pricing based on the number of messages processed.  

Strengths	Weaknesses
Low-code platform (Power Virtual Agents) for building bots with minimal coding	Limited customization options for advanced AI tasks
Multichannel deployment, allowing bots to be used across various platforms	May require more coding for complex bots or integrating with specific systems
Centralized management for easy bot administration and monitoring	Potential challenges in integrating with non-Microsoft tools or platforms

How Do AIs Code: AI’s Techniques for Code Generation

AI models employ various techniques for code generation, including:

• Natural Language Processing (NLP): This technique enables models to understand and interpret human language, allowing them to generate code from natural language descriptions.
• Deep Learning: This technique involves training models on massive datasets of code, enabling them to learn patterns and generate code that aligns with specific programming languages and styles.
• Reinforcement Learning: This technique allows models to learn from feedback and improve their code generation abilities over time.
• Mixture-of-Experts (MoE): This technique involves using multiple specialized models for different coding tasks, leading to more efficient and accurate code generation. For example, DeepSeek utilizes an MoE approach ¹¹, while Grok combines it with DeepSearch for step-by-step reasoning ²³.

These techniques, combined with advancements in model architectures and training methodologies, contribute to the impressive code generation capabilities of AI models in 2025.

Limitations in Code Generation For Non-Technical People

Despite their advancements, AI models still face limitations in code generation:

Model	Limitations in Code Generation for Non-Technical People
ChatGPT	May struggle with complex or nuanced coding scenarios that require deep domain knowledge or specific project requirements.
DeepSeek	Tendency to generate hallucinations or incorrect information and codes.
Gemini	Limitations in handling edge cases and potential for hallucinations.
Claude	Occasional crashes and verbosity, which can overwhelm non-technical users.
Qwen	Requires high computing power, making it less accessible for casual or non-technical users.
Grok	Limitations in reasoning depth and fact-checking, which may confuse users unfamiliar with debugging or technical validation.
Mistral	Vulnerable to prompt injections, which can lead to unintended outputs that are difficult for non-technical users to manage.
Llama	Struggles with complex mathematical or reasoning tasks, limiting its effectiveness for intricate programming requirements.
Azure AI	Requires some coding knowledge for effective use; non-technical users may find it challenging to navigate the platform’s tools and configurations.
GitHub Copilot	May generate insecure or inefficient code if prompts are unclear; requires manual review, which can be daunting for non-technical individuals.

These limitations highlight the need for ongoing research and development to address these challenges and ensure responsible and ethical AI code generation.

How Much Do AI Coding Assistants Cost?

AI models have different availability and cost structures:

• Open-Source Models: DeepSeek and Mistral offer open-source models, allowing for free access and customization. However, users may incur costs for computational resources and API usage.
• Proprietary Models: ChatGPT, Gemini, and Claude are proprietary models with varying pricing structures. They often offer free tiers with limited usage and paid subscriptions for advanced features and higher usage limits.
• API Pricing: Many models provide API access for developers to integrate AI capabilities into their applications. API pricing typically involves charges per token or request.

This is a table to compare costs amongst the most popular AI for coding:

Model	Cost
ChatGPT	Free, Plus ($20/month), Pro ($200/month), Team ($30/user/month), Enterprise (custom)
DeepSeek	Free, Pro ($1/million tokens), API (usage-based)
Gemini	Free, Advanced ($19.99/month), Business ($20/user/month), Enterprise ($30/user/month), Code Assist Standard ($19/user/month), Code Assist Enterprise ($45/user/month), Vertex AI (usage-based)
Claude	Free, Pro ($20/month), Team ($30/user/month), Enterprise (custom), API (usage-based)
Qwen	Open-source models (free), API (usage-based)
Grok	Free (limited), X Premium ($8/month), X Premium+ ($40/month), SuperGrok ($30/month), API (usage-based expected)
Mistral	Open-source models (free), API (usage-based)
Llama	Open-source models (free), Commercial use (licensing through Meta)
GitHub Copilot	For individuals ($10/month), For businesses ($19/user/month)
Microsoft Azure AI	Varies by service (Azure OpenAI Service, Azure Cognitive Services, Azure Bot Service)

Use Cases in Code Generation

AI models are transforming software development with diverse use cases:

• ChatGPT: Suitable for general code generation, debugging, and exploring code libraries.
• DeepSeek: Excels in technical writing scenarios and competitive programming challenges.
• Gemini: Ideal for multimodal code generation, integrating text and images for enhanced coding assistance.
• Claude: Well-suited for automating code review and linting tasks, ensuring code quality and consistency.
• Qwen: Strong in regional tech ecosystems and supports machine learning and data science workflows.
• Grok: Ideal for real-time data analysis and complex problem-solving in coding tasks.
• Mistral: Optimized for enterprise-level applications and multilingual code generation.
• Llama: Efficient and versatile for various coding tasks, including code completion and infilling.
• Azure AI: Supports natural language to code, SQL query generation, refactoring, documentation, and integrating AI into workflows.
• GitHub Copilot: Excels in real-time code suggestions, autocompletion, test generation, error fixing, and inline explanations within IDEs.

The Future of Software Development

AI models are poised to revolutionize software development:

• Automation of Tasks: AI can automate repetitive coding tasks, freeing developers to focus on higher-level problem-solving and creative design.
• Improved Code Quality: AI can assist in debugging, code optimization, and security analysis, leading to more robust and reliable software.
• Changing Role of Developers: AI will likely transform the role of developers, requiring them to adapt to new tools and workflows while focusing on more strategic and creative aspects of software development.

As AI technology continues to evolve, we can expect even more sophisticated code generation capabilities, further transforming the software development landscape.

Conclusion

After exploring the dynamic landscape of AI coding models in 2025, it’s clear that we’re witnessing a transformative era for software development. Models like ChatGPT, DeepSeek, Gemini, Claude, Qwen, Grok, Mistral, Llama, GitHub Copilot, and Azure AI each bring unique strengths to the table, catering to diverse needs and use cases.

Based on these insights, here are recommendations for choosing the best model:

• For everyday conversations, writing assistance, and coding, ChatGPT is a strong choice.
• For research-based tasks, summarization, and fact-checking, DeepSeek might be a better option.
• For enterprise automation, multilingual support, and open-source customization, Mistral is ideal.

As a leading IT solutions provider in Singapore, Vinova focuses on AI development and integrating AI into our workflow to enhance productivity, deliver cutting-edge results, and ensure optimal delivery. 

To stay ahead of the AI curve, drop by our site or follow our blog for the latest updates, in-depth analyses, and expert insights into integrating AI into your coding.